Carl Emil Overbeck vs Philip Sekulic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In terms of second serve performance over the last six months, Philip Sekulic has won 42.45% of points, slightly outperforming Carl Emil Overbeck, who sits at 40.91%.
• How do they compare in return games? Sekulic has an edge, winning 46.42% of points on opponents' second serves, while Overbeck wins 45.59%.
• Analyzing under pressure situations, Overbeck has saved 51.78% of breakpoints, slightly better than Sekulic's 50.00%.
• Performance overview shows Overbeck with a higher match win rate over the last year at 65.71%, compared to Sekulic's 57.50%.
• On favorite surfaces, Sekulic excels on Grass with a 57% win rate, while Overbeck favors Hard courts, boasting a 57% win percentage.
• Player level assessment reveals Overbeck's success in ITF $10K tournaments with a 65.63% win rate, surpassing Sekulic's 48.15% in higher-tier Challenger events.
• Regarding opponent quality, Sekulic has faced tougher competition with an average opponent ranking of 302.43 versus Overbeck's 354.6 over the past year.
• Deciding set statistics favor Sekulic, who has won 80% of his deciding sets in the past 12 months, compared to Overbeck's 57%.
• Converting breakpoints is an area where Overbeck excels, achieving a 36.50% conversion rate versus Sekulic's 30.46%.

Editorial Prediction (November 10, 2025, UTC):

Assessing recent performance and statistics, Philip Sekulic has a slight edge on second serve effectiveness and returning opponents' serves, indicating strong baseline play.

However, Carl Emil Overbeck demonstrates resilience under pressure with a higher breakpoint save percentage and excels at converting breakpoint opportunities.

Overbeck's superior performance in lower-tier tournaments and his higher win percentage over the past year suggest experience in handling competitive matches, though Sekulic's decisiveness in final sets might offer a strategic advantage.

Factoring in the quality of opponents and playing surfaces, this match presents a balanced contest with both players having unique strengths.

Considering these points, Carl Emil Overbeck is likely to emerge as the winner due to his adaptability and experience against a diverse pool of opponents.